<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: public information.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2006/02/08/public-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2006/02/08/public-information/</link>
	<description>more cloud power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 05:11:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Holsman</title>
		<link>http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2006/02/08/public-information/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Holsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul.
I guess the main difference in the numbers is because of the way you differ in reading them.

Bloglines polls each blog people are subscribed to each X hours/minutes, while technorati indexes on pings.

is 3.8m better than 1.8m?
no idea.. I leave that to the marketing people to figure out ;-)

and I&#039;m sure technorati also has some form have splog protection as well.

but what is important to me is that both index my site, and they do ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul.<br />
I guess the main difference in the numbers is because of the way you differ in reading them.</p>
<p>Bloglines polls each blog people are subscribed to each X hours/minutes, while technorati indexes on pings.</p>
<p>is 3.8m better than 1.8m?<br />
no idea.. I leave that to the marketing people to figure out <img src='http://journal.paul.querna.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>and I&#8217;m sure technorati also has some form have splog protection as well.</p>
<p>but what is important to me is that both index my site, and they do <img src='http://journal.paul.querna.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2006/02/08/public-information/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 07:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38</guid>
		<description>So, if people subscribed to your comments feed, would bloglines count each comment as an &quot;article&quot;?  People subscribe to feeds that aren&#039;t feeds of blog posts.  Does bloglines differentiate between blog post feed and non-blog post feeds when it comes up with these numbers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if people subscribed to your comments feed, would bloglines count each comment as an &#8220;article&#8221;?  People subscribe to feeds that aren&#8217;t feeds of blog posts.  Does bloglines differentiate between blog post feed and non-blog post feeds when it comes up with these numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David N. Welton</title>
		<link>http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2006/02/08/public-information/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>David N. Welton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 03:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37</guid>
		<description>The word &quot;blog&quot; itself is pretty horrible.  I&#039;ve said it before, and I&#039;ll say it again: it sounds like something nasty that you have to call a plumber about, because it requires power tools to remove from your toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;blog&#8221; itself is pretty horrible.  I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again: it sounds like something nasty that you have to call a plumber about, because it requires power tools to remove from your toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baus</title>
		<link>http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2006/02/08/public-information/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>baus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-36</guid>
		<description>So what about that search engine?  

You guys really should show off your citation feature more.  That&#039;s a way under used tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what about that search engine?  </p>
<p>You guys really should show off your citation feature more.  That&#8217;s a way under used tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
