Comments on: Gadget APIs http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/07/26/gadget-apis/ Now with less async io Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:01:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Xavier Borderie http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/07/26/gadget-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-201 Xavier Borderie Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:04:53 +0000 #comment-201 Hey Paul, glad to hear of your interest for UWA. I can certify you that UWA is far from dead, and is a major project of Netvibes. Since April, we've kept improving and fine-tuning it, and will have a few good announcements soon. Stay tuned. <br /><br /> Don't hesitate to contact us if you need to know anything. Hey Paul, glad to hear of your interest for UWA. I can certify you that UWA is far from dead, and is a major project of Netvibes. Since April, we’ve kept improving and fine-tuning it, and will have a few good announcements soon. Stay tuned.

Don’t hesitate to contact us if you need to know anything.

]]> By: Paul http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/07/26/gadget-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-200 Paul Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:35:46 +0000 #comment-200 I think if UWA was explicitly made an open standard, and parts of it were actually written like a standard, and if it looked like NetVibes hadn't just dropped it dead since release, Bloglines would be very interested in just using UWA. I think if UWA was explicitly made an open standard, and parts of it were actually written like a standard, and if it looked like NetVibes hadn’t just dropped it dead since release, Bloglines would be very interested in just using UWA.

]]> By: Joe Winter http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/07/26/gadget-apis/comment-page-1/#comment-199 Joe Winter Fri, 27 Jul 2007 09:22:38 +0000 #comment-199 Me too. Does Bloglines have any interest in creating an open standard or supporting the UWA? Me too. Does Bloglines have any interest in creating an open standard or supporting the UWA?

]]>