Comments on: in reply to “bloglines sucks” http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/ Now with p2p Live Technology Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:12:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Mo http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1455 Mo Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:19:25 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1455 I might be being thick, but I thought individual feed items included metadata indicating when they were last updated themselves—or is this so unreliable as to be useless? I might be being thick, but I thought individual feed items included metadata indicating when they were last updated themselves—or is this so unreliable as to be useless?

]]> By: The trouble with versioning (v1) « Assetbar: drinks and recipes http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1388 The trouble with versioning (v1) « Assetbar: drinks and recipes Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:21:46 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1388 [...] posts is hard. Google doesn’t do it. Bloglines beta used to partially do it (but they turned it off). But I want Assetbar to fully support versioning. It can make you want to hit your head against [...] […] posts is hard. Google doesn’t do it. Bloglines beta used to partially do it (but they turned it off). But I want Assetbar to fully support versioning. It can make you want to hit your head against […]

]]> By: Andy Skelton http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1300 Andy Skelton Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:44:25 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1300 We're sorry about that. The rand value is not needed and we removed it today. We’re sorry about that. The rand value is not needed and we removed it today.

]]> By: Daniel Goldman http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1299 Daniel Goldman Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:45:00 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1299 Paul, thanks for responding to Robert's post. I'm also a subscriber of his, and it was really annoying to keep on seeing his last 50 feeds. Anyways, I was wondering if you guys follow up on forum threads. <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/forums/read.php?13,5184,5184#msg-5184" rel="nofollow">I posted in the forums about an issue</a> about an issue I have with Bloglines and how it displays my feed. No one from Bloglines has yet to respond. (In short, links and images don't show up in my feed) I have more than 450 subscribers on Bloglines, it's a shame that they can't see my feed in its correct format. Paul, I hope you could either take a look at it yourself or pass it along to the appropriate person at Bloglines. Thanks, Daniel Paul,

thanks for responding to Robert’s post. I’m also a subscriber of his, and it was really annoying to keep on seeing his last 50 feeds.

Anyways, I was wondering if you guys follow up on forum threads. I posted in the forums about an issue about an issue I have with Bloglines and how it displays my feed. No one from Bloglines has yet to respond.

(In short, links and images don’t show up in my feed)

I have more than 450 subscribers on Bloglines, it’s a shame that they can’t see my feed in its correct format.

Paul, I hope you could either take a look at it yourself or pass it along to the appropriate person at Bloglines.

Thanks,
Daniel

]]> By: zack http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1297 zack Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:11:05 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1297 you know, this feature actually drove me to stop using bloglines after many months of frustration. yes, I could have looked into it more, but I'm just lazy I guess. you know, this feature actually drove me to stop using bloglines after many months of frustration. yes, I could have looked into it more, but I’m just lazy I guess.

]]> By: Gary Petersen http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1296 Gary Petersen Fri, 28 Dec 2007 14:30:26 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1296 Thanks for looking into this and posting a fix, Paul. It is very much appreciated. Thanks for looking into this and posting a fix, Paul. It is very much appreciated.

]]> By: Jonas M Luster http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1295 Jonas M Luster Fri, 28 Dec 2007 13:36:47 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1295 So, let me try to get this straight - Robert Scoble cries foul and "sucks" over a feature which many of your users love (and which brings many of your users to Bloglines instead of, say, Google Reader), in utter ignorance of the reasons and facts, and you remove said feature for everyone? What precisely makes Robert Scoble a better gauge of Bloglines' features than, say, the people using it? He isn't a user. He just potentially, hearsay-y, loses readers, I (and the x-thousand other users) lose a feature. So, let me try to get this straight - Robert Scoble cries foul and “sucks” over a feature which many of your users love (and which brings many of your users to Bloglines instead of, say, Google Reader), in utter ignorance of the reasons and facts, and you remove said feature for everyone?

What precisely makes Robert Scoble a better gauge of Bloglines’ features than, say, the people using it? He isn’t a user. He just potentially, hearsay-y, loses readers, I (and the x-thousand other users) lose a feature.

]]> By: niq http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1293 niq Fri, 28 Dec 2007 11:16:22 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1293 It is possible to implement a metric that'll detect significant change but ignore trivia like this, based on markup analysis. I did some work on such metrics in the context of Site Valet and the W3C Evaluation and Repair working group, to detect whether a change to a page may invalidate a piece of independent metadata about the page, such as the reports generated by Site Valet. Ping me if you'd like me to look for pointers to this stuff! It is possible to implement a metric that’ll detect significant change but ignore trivia like this, based on markup analysis. I did some work on such metrics in the context of Site Valet and the W3C Evaluation and Repair working group, to detect whether a change to a page may invalidate a piece of independent metadata about the page, such as the reports generated by Site Valet.

Ping me if you’d like me to look for pointers to this stuff!

]]> By: Bloglines doesn’t suck « Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1288 Bloglines doesn’t suck « Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger Fri, 28 Dec 2007 08:58:23 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1288 [...] doesn’t suck Here’s Bloglines reply about the issue with my feed. Nice to see this taken care of, thanks. I mean that sincerely. Filed under: scoble @ 1:58 am [...] […] doesn’t suck Here’s Bloglines reply about the issue with my feed. Nice to see this taken care of, thanks. I mean that sincerely. Filed under: scoble @ 1:58 am […]

]]> By: Dana Epp http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1287 Dana Epp Fri, 28 Dec 2007 07:30:29 +0000 http://journal.paul.querna.org/articles/2007/12/27/in-reply-to-bloglines-sucks/#comment-1287 Hey Paul, Thanks for the interm fix! Appreciate the efforts. Have a Happy New Year! Hey Paul,

Thanks for the interm fix! Appreciate the efforts. Have a Happy New Year!

]]>